Krympress reports:
There is no unity of opinions regarding the quality of work performed using artificial intelligence. Service Superjob observes the attitude of society towards the use of neural networks in work. The survey was attended by representatives of the economically active population from Crimea.
27% of surveyed residents of Crimea relate to work performed with the help of neural networks, as high -quality and the same (27%) — as a hack. 46% have not yet decided on the assessment: “Depends on people who control these processes”; “He will bring unemployment in the future, and therefore we are in confrontation”; “Standard turns, information from the network, very often — plagiarism of other people’s texts. But quickly processes large volumes. ” Men more often criticize AI (32% versus 27% of approving), referring to inaccuracies and professional unsuitability in specific areas: “The results of AI are currently not always true and accurate”; «In my specialty (design) he is a profan», -They note in the press service of the service.
The higher the income of the respondents, the more often they express skepticism. Residents of Crimea with higher education are inclined to criticize the results of AI’s work more often surveyed with secondary vocational education.
But 3 out of 10 respondents younger than 35 years old support the use of neural networks, noting their effectiveness in solving the same problems and automation of processes: “The work accelerates and simplifies significantly”; “Rutin tasks and optimization of simple manual actions”; “Simple texts of the neural network writes better than most beginner SMM-sh are.” It seems that young people managed to make friends with AI: «Good help, but checking and accepting the result — after me.»
Time: 12-21 February 2025
Crimea news | Krympress: Latest news and main events
Comments are closed.