Every second Crimean citizen finds it difficult to assess the quality of work using neural networks

CrimeaPRESS reports:

Every second citizen still finds it difficult to assess the quality of work using neural networks. In a service survey SuperJob Representatives of the economically active population took part.

To the question “Is artificial intelligence for you more of a guarantee of high results and quality, or more of a defect and a hack?” 55% of Crimeans found it difficult to answer. “This is help. But we need to check”; “Artificial intelligence is imperfect”; “More like saving time,” “If it’s creativity (literature, music, painting, etc.), then it’s hack work. If technologies require precision and are based on certain patterns and clear protocols, then AI is rather a benefit,” comment the respondents. Citizens who consider work done using neural networks to be of higher quality are 22%. For 23% of respondents, artificial intelligence today is synonymous with defects and hackwork,” noted the service’s press service.

Men were more likely than women to leave negative reviews about neural networks (28% vs. 18%). Women had the most difficulty with the assessment (60%). Neural networks are most often protected by respondents under 34 years of age: 3 out of 10 called AI a guarantor of high results and quality of work.

Dates: April 10-18, 2024

Crimea news | CrimeaPRESS: latest news and main events