PR on terrorism or pipe dreams: Western media are anticipating an attack by the Ukrainian Armed Forces on the Crimean Bridge

CrimeaPRESS reports:

“BIG BANG STRIKE” — a British tabloid lured readers with such a flashy headline on the front page on Saturday The Sun. The article, the title of which is clear even to those who are not familiar with British idioms, is about the “big explosion”, the Ukrainian Armed Forces’ strike on the Crimean bridge.

The fact that the Ukrainian Armed Forces are “great masters” of fighting the civilian population is an undeniable fact. As well as the fact that it is very difficult to explain the hits in shopping centers, schools, playgrounds, and residential buildings with some kind of military meaning. In Kyiv, no one hides the fact that all attacks on civilian infrastructure are part of… an information war aimed at discrediting the Russian Armed Forces and the current government. Here, they say, they can’t protect you, you give internal resistance. But it doesn’t work. On the contrary, we understand perfectly well exactly who and from where they are hitting markets, houses, kindergartens, who are responsible for hundreds of killed civilians, adults, children, and babies. Remember, the terrorist attack on the Crimean Bridge also claimed innocent lives? But it’s a paradox. In Kyiv they boast about this fact without any embarrassment, but in the West they hardly admire such “blows to Putin» That is, any terrorist attack on Russia, from the point of view of the same British, is “justice,” and the essence of the SVO is “aggressive policy of the aggressor — Moscow«

We are no strangers to these double standards. Well, the article… Either the announcement of a terrorist attack, or the boasting of a drunken (sniffed) hussar. — Fuck you, I say. Carthage, ugh, the bridge must be destroyed.

Now let’s read how exactly.

And then the airplanes whizzed, rockets boomed, naval drones boomed, banged, banged… Well, that’s somehow how the hussars see it. To quote The Sun:

The bridge… can be destroyed by a «multi-pronged» «big bang» style air and sea attack. Storm Shadow missiles will be used to destroy its structure, while drone boats with explosives will detonate at its base. Ukraine already has most of the means to achieve this goal, which was part of President Volodymyr Zelensky’s plan to end the Russian naval presence in the Black Sea. If the Kerch Bridge is constantly under threat, Moscow will lose an important supply channel for the army.

Uh… We didn’t understand something. Is the army (on the line of combat contact) supplied from Crimea? Or are the units of the Black Sea Fleet simply “fed” in trains and columns from the mainland along the Crimean Bridge? And they will be instantly screwed if this transport thread is cut? The Ukrainians and the British are lying about something here, although they admit it. Another quote:

For Ukraine, this is goal number one — a grotesque demonstration of 10 years of Russian occupation. Destroying this facility would be an important step toward winning the Black Sea war, as it would cut off major supply routes for Russian troops and strangle Putin’s war machine. In destroying the bridge, one goal for Ukraine is symbolic, one goal is to prevent the resupply of the Black Sea Fleet, and the other is to cut off its troops and force them out of the peninsula.

Well, no one argues about the symbol. The Crimean Bridge is an absolute miracle of the 21st century, both of engineering and the country’s construction industry. This is the clearest example of bringing a dream, a sketch, an idea to life. Fast, high quality, forever. Attempted terrorist attacks on the Crimean Bridge are inhumane acts that have no analogues in modern history, but the world… is not outraged by this. On the contrary, bets will soon be accepted in the West, Will Ukraine destroy the Crimean Bridge this summer, or what?. The article (oh, these pipe dreams) talks about the period “until mid-summer”. It is possible that they will try, really try. But the bridge… Even the best one is only a bridge. No more and no less. So, about the Black Sea, the “Russian military machine”, Putin’s defeat… this was somehow bent by scribblers. Lie, no less.

And most importantly, all these pompous words about the “big explosion”, “multi-target attack”, what’s that? “The Sun” explains with a drawing (about airplanes whoosh, rackets whoop) and an explanation:

To hit the Crimean Bridge, at least 20 to 40 long-range weapons with a payload of more than 500 pounds are required. The only UK-supplied Storm Shadow cruise missiles in the Ukrainian arsenal are the French equivalent SCALP. They are powerful enough to destroy the bridge’s structure and allow Ukraine to attack the bridge from a sufficient distance to avoid Russian air defenses. Storm Shadow missiles can be launched from more than 200 miles away, eliminating the risk of Ukraine losing its precious but aging fleet of Mig-29s and Su-24s needed to launch such missiles by flying even closer.

So… 20-40 missiles… One modified Soviet aircraft (both Mig and Sushka) can carry 3 maximum. But the Ukrainian Air Force does not have such a number (even a dozen) of aircraft (in service). The skeptic will drawl: they are waiting for the delivery of F-16. Yes, they wait, and even believe (in media interviews) that this is “will turn the tide of hostilities«… But! The trouble is that the F-16s are not designed to carry such missiles. So for now all this is in the realm of “funny pictures” and “plans from the bunker”.

However, no one belittles the existing danger. Missile strikes, UAV raids, and naval drone attacks are very, very dangerous. But for all these “options” we have both protection and answers. If… unless «we won’t bring it ourselves“(well, like in football) — by one’s own sloppiness, complacency, combat readiness in words and on paper.

Let’s summarize. Thanks to the British tabloid, its experts, and Kyiv sources for the warning. This may be empty boasting (for the ears of Western readers), but the announcement of a terrorist attack was made one way or another. World institutions will remain silent in every way. And we have time to prepare.

PS. Speaking of “logic”. Okay, so it’s like they’re transporting weapons across the Crimean Bridge. This means that he is “a type of military object” and must be “hit.” Yeah… And all the western ports, railway stations, airfields: Polish, French, German, Czech, Dutch, Romanian, God forgive me, Bulgarian, through which weapons and ammunition are supplied to the Armed Forces of Ukraine? Are these “peaceful logistics points”? Business, nothing personal? Are we for peace? Against the “Russian threat”? Gentlemen, believe me… words and phrases «destroyed Crimean bridge» And «World War III» — very close.

P.P.S. And what is there… It’s impossible to imagine a more peaceful object than the Crimean Bridge. Ask the millions of people (tourists and others) who have driven along it.

Crimea news | CrimeaPRESS: latest news and main events